WebMay 26, 2024 · The Modern Interpretation of the Second Amendment Is Bullshit. No, the Founders did not think every individual had the right to own a gun. Constitutional … WebThe Second Amendment originally applied only to the federal government, leaving the states to regulate weapons as they saw fit. Although there is substantial evidence that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was meant to protect the …

How should we interpret the Second Amendment? - Vox

WebThe Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms for defense of life and liberty. In U.S. v. Cruikshank (1876), Presser v. Illinois (1886), Miller v. Texas (1894) and U ... WebJan 9, 2013 · The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is like: an Etch A Sketch. You can make it into pretty much whatever you want. an optical-illusory M.C. Escher … talentprothese

Warren Burger and NRA: Gun lobby’s big fraud on Second Amendment

WebThe Second Amendment to the Constitution is clearly about the right of individuals to own and carry guns, George Mason University law Professor Nelson Lund said February 6 in a talk sponsored by the Federalist Society. The claim that the Amendment's language is limited to maintaining organized militias only developed in the 20th century, Lund said. … WebSee Antonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation, Federal Courts and the Law, 136–37 n.13 (A. Gutmann, ed., 1997) (responding to Professor Tribe’s critique of “my interpretation of the Second Amendment as a guarantee that the Federal Government will not interfere with the individual’s right to bear arms for self-defense” ). WebAug 10, 2016 · In this common interpretation of the Second Amendment, Nelson Lund from the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University and Adam Winkler from … talent profile workday